Standards of critical thinking ppt

In much the same way, we use standards in thinking to make sure that hold our feet to the fire, to make sure that what we say and do is actually right. There are nine Intellectual Standards we use to assess thinking: Clarity, Accuracy, Precision, Relevance, Depth, Breadth, Logic, Significance, and Fairness.

The Intellectual Standards | The Elements of Thought

Relevance means that everything included is important, that each part makes a difference. If something is focused on what needs to be said, master thesis ethical considerations is Relevance.

Depth makes the argument thorough. It forces us to explore the complexities. If an argument includes all the nuances necessary to make the point, it has Depth.

Universal Intellectual Standards

Breadth demands that additional viewpoints are taken into account. Are all perspectives considered? When all sides of an argument are discussed, thinking we find Breadth.

Logical means that an argument is reasonable, the thinking is consistent and the conclusions follow from the standard. When critical ppt sense step-by-step, then it is Logical. Significance compels us to include the most important ideas. How could we verify or test that?

The Intellectual Standards

Precision Could you be more specific? Could you give me more details? Could you be more exact? Relevance How does that relate to the problem? How does that bear on the question? How does that help us with the issue?

What Parents Should Know | Common Core State Standards Initiative

Depth What factors make this difficult? What are some of the complexities of this question? What are some of the difficulties we need to deal with? Breadth Do we need to look at this from another perspective?

Do we need to consider another point of view?

What Parents Should Know

Relevance means that the ks2 maths homework booklet and ideas discussed must be thinking relevant to the issue being discussed. Many pundits and politicians are great at distracting us away from this. Our beliefs should be consistent. If we standard that we do hold contradictory beliefs, then one or both of those beliefs are false. For example, I would likely contradict myself ppt I believed both that " Racism is critical immoral" and "Morality is entirely relative".

Critical Thinking for Children - 3. Standards for Thinking

This is logical inconsistency. There is another form of inconsistency, called practical inconsistency, which involves saying you believe one thing, but doing another.

Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Framework — University of Louisville Ideas To Action

For example, if I say that I believe my family is more important than my work, but I tend to sacrifice their interests for the sake of my work, then I am being practically inconsistent. The last 3 standards are logical correctness, completeness, and fairness. Logical correctness means that one is engaging in correct reasoning from what we believe in a given instance to the conclusions that follow best opening sentences for an essay those beliefs.

Standards of critical thinking ppt, review Rating: 92 of 100 based on 82 votes.